Open interfaces, one human gate, and a record of every call.
A program office is buying risk reduction before it is buying capability. DaggerOS is built so the three risks you have to answer for — accountability, autonomy, and lock-in — are retired by design.
Why DaggerOS fits your mission.
Lower program risk
Built to a Modular Open Systems Approach on published interfaces. The government owns the interface and the mission data; commercial software licensed per DFARS 227.7202. See the data-rights posture.
An ATO path you can actually walk
Designed against what an assessor reviews: NIST RMF 800-37 and the 800-53 controls catalog, with an air-gapped, passive-default posture that shrinks the external attack surface.
Autonomy risk, retired
Human-in-command by architecture, aligned to DoDD 3000.09. No autonomous engagement path exists — and you can test the gate yourself.
Maturity you can cite
TRL 7–8, demonstrated under live, operationally representative, third-party conditions at T-REX 26-2 (May 2026). Demonstrated, not certified — stated plainly.
Bring the standard your office evaluates against and the acquisition pathway you prefer — FAR Part 12, OTA, SBIR Phase III, or firm-fixed-price. DaggerOS is aligned to all four.
DoD program offices — common questions.
Can DaggerOS get an ATO?
Who owns the data and the interface?
What acquisition pathways fit?
Bring us a problem that spans domains.
One operator should hold it. The AI recommends. A human decides.